by Peter Sewell on Dec 7, 2021 | Tags: Reviewing
Peer review is an essential aspect of academic research, giving a feedback loop that stimulates and rewards high-quality work – but as we all know, it doesn’t always function well. To help maintain a consensus of what constitutes good reviewing, this note spells out some bad and good reasons to reject and accept papers.
Read more...
by Christos Kozyrakis and Emery Berger on Aug 19, 2021 | Tags: ASPLOS, conferences, extended abstract, program committees, Review, Reviewing
Note: This is a cross-post from the ACM SIGARCH blog; see the original post for additional comments and discussion from the SIGARCH community. Background When we started planning the ASPLOS’21 program committee in Spring 2020, we asked ourselves what we could do to...
Read more...
