by Emery D. Berger, Stephen M. Blackburn, Matthias Hauswirth, Michael W. Hicks on Aug 28, 2019 | Tags: Artifact evaluation, Measurements, Methodology
To avoid an empirical replication crisis in programming languages research, PL researchers should employ the best scientific practices for empirical evaluation. A SIGPLAN empirical evaluation committee has assembled a checklist to help.
Read more...
by Andrew Myers on Aug 14, 2019 | Tags: conferences, publication process, scientific journals
Journals broaden the impact of PL. One way to make journals a more attractive publication vehicle is to allow presentations of journal papers at PL conferences, as TOPLAS does.
Read more...
by Benjamin Pierce, Michael Hicks, Crista Lopes, and Jens Palsberg on Jul 17, 2019 | Tags: carbon footprint, carbon offset, climate change, conferences
How should ACM address its contribution to climate change? After two years of discussions and study, the SIGPLAN Climate Committee proposes that (1) all ACM conferences should publicly *account* for the CO2e emitted as a result of putting them on; and that (2) ACM should put a *price* onĀ carbon in conference budgets, to create incentive for organizers to reduce their footprints.
Read more...
by Jeremy Gibbons on Jul 3, 2019 | Tags: conferences, open access
This post is about Plan-S, a new policy being agreed by cOAlition-S, a consortium of (mostly) European research funding agencies. The policy will mandate Gold Open Access to the research funded by these agencies. The effects will be dramatic: in Programming Languages...
Read more...